Connect with us

Blockchain

IBM executive says blockchain becoming a useful ‘real business tool’

Published

on



It was just a few years ago that enterprises began showing interest in using blockchain as a technology to bring trust, transparency and better collaboration to multiple entities sharing sensitive business data. Yet as the blockchain space has matured, more companies have started to view blockchain less as a technology and more as an important business tool for digitalization. 

IBM Blockchain’s general manager, Alistair Rennie, noticed this evolution earlier this year. Cointelegraph had the pleasure of speaking with Rennie to learn more about the evolving enterprise blockchain landscape, how blockchain is playing an important role in IBM’s hybrid cloud strategy, and why “Big Blue” firmly agrees with the principles of private, permissioned networks.

Cointelegraph: What is IBM’s blockchain strategy?

Alistair Rennie: Now that blockchain has been in the marketplace for a reasonable number of years and we’ve worked on hundreds of networks, we are wondering where blockchain fits in within the enterprise digitization journey.

For instance, there is a lot of work being done in financial services and within supply chain networks. We’ve also discovered that many of these networks are not huge in scope and that they have a small number of players getting started with some significant value propositions. Networks can start simple and can grow over time, and we are going to try to address some of this with our solution portfolio.

We’ve also come to understand that blockchain fits into the enterprise architecture in its ability to allow companies to digitize their business processes with other companies. This shows that blockchain is evolving from a technology into a real business tool and that adoption can happen really fast. For example, when COVID-19 began, we saw phenomenal examples of cross-company data-sharing using blockchain as the mechanism. But what was really impressive was the speed.

Blockchain doesn’t have to be a complicated, long-time project. That being said, we are mainly working on blockchain becoming the fundamental component of our hybrid cloud platform for collaboration and trust.

CT: Can you talk more about the role blockchain will play within the IBM hybrid cloud platform?

AR: What blockchain uniquely provides is its ability for people to integrate and manage workflows that go outside of company boundaries. There are ways people can do this today, but it tends to be clunky and involve lots of centralized software and process change.

Blockchain turns out to be a fast way to integrate business data, while using smart contracts for automation of workflows. It creates the capability for collaboration and trust when organizations are dealing with multiple parties.

CT: How can private networks ensure trust with outside entities?

AR: Blockchain technology allows people to share information on a ledger, while smart contracts manage the workflows. For instance, farmers on a blockchain network aren’t sharing all their data with the other farmers, as people can manage who sees what on a private network.

This allows for organizations to enter a blockchain network with a relatively safe mindset that sharing data is okay, and value can be extracted from that. Ultimately, private networks allow people to have visibility for the data they require yet still have a good degree of trust.

Related: From Sea to Table: Norway’s Seafood Industry Hooks Into IBM Blockchain

A good example of this is what Atea ASA, an IT infrastructure provider for the Nordic and Baltic regions, is doing. It is using the IBM Blockchain network to connect seafood farmers with processors and retailers.

CT: How is the IBM hybrid cloud platform different from what IBM Blockchain has already been providing to clients?

AR: The big difference is how we speak to clients. We’ve gone through a phase where blockchain, like any other technology, is viewed purely through a technology lens. But now we are seeing a mainstreaming of that conversation.

We are talking to people from the financial services world and supply chain sector where the word “blockchain” doesn’t even come up. All these organizations care about is provenance, track and trace, and dispute resolution. We want to talk to companies about how to collaborate and create workflows outside of their own environments, using blockchain. The IBM hybrid cloud offering also packages everything an organization needs to easily create a blockchain network. This makes a big difference in terms of driving adoption.

CT: What types of enterprises will want to use the IBM hybrid cloud strategy?

AR: Supply chain management impacts many different companies. These organizations are trying to get visibility through the supply chain, which sounds straightforward, but this is actually very difficult because everything runs on different systems.

In the financial services sector, we are seeing blockchain being used in settlement networks like We.trade. The Blockchain Community Initiative also just announced that its electronic letter-of-guarantee platform has successfully advanced and is now extending the reach of its services and network to businesses of all sizes.

The platform went live in late 2019 and currently handles $300 million in guarantee letters. It has proven to reduce letter-of-guarantee issuance time to less than a day. Basically, any place where there are multibank settlements and connections is where blockchain can be applied. We are also starting to see more experimentation and work with central banks looking to implement a digital currency.

CT: Would IBM ever consider creating a public blockchain for enterprises to leverage?

AR: The principles that we have in place show that IBM cares a lot about blockchain networks that are permissioned and private yet manageable to the people running them. We are focused on making technology more accessible to different organizations and allowing people to start quickly and get value.

In addition, there will be a lot of work needing to be done as these networks go from experimentation to fully functional. Organizations will have to figure out how to govern blockchain networks, how to audit them and how to talk to regulators.

I think the principles of permissioned and private make a lot of sense, and there are many things we can do to make them easily adoptable and accessible.



Source link

Blockchain

The new ‘Bank of England’ is ‘no bank at all’

Published

on

By



As one of the first countries to industrialize in the 1760s, Britain’s manufacturing revolution instigated one of the greatest practical and ubiquitous changes in human history. But even more extraordinary than the cultural shift itself, is the fact that Britain’s industrialization remained way ahead of potential competition for decades. Only in the early 1900s did historians come to grips with the issues of causation. Max Weber’s pithy answer, “the Protestant work ethic,” pointed to Puritan seriousness, diligence, fiscal prudence and hard work. Others point to the establishment of the Bank of England in 1694 as a foundation for financial stability.

In contrast, continental Europe lurched from one national debt crisis to another, then threw itself headlong into the Napoleonic wars. Unsurprisingly, it was not until after 1815 that industrialization took place on the European mainland, where it was spearheaded by the new country of Belgium.

250 years later, another revolution has begun with the launch of Bitcoin (BTC), but this one is more commercial in nature than industrial. Though the full impact has yet to play out, the parallels between these two historical events are already striking.

Bitcoin may not match the obviousness of industrialization, but the underlying pragmatics touch on the very foundations of the non-barter economy. Like the establishment of the Bank of England, the creation of the cryptocurrency infrastructure has been prompted by ongoing and worsening threats to financial stability: systemic fault-lines created by macroeconomic challenges stemming from the 2008 financial crisis.

If you can’t beat ‘em, join ‘em…right?

Where a central bank once anchored financial enlightenment, it now plays the role of antagonist. For those who could “connect the dots” in 2008, there was the realization that central banks no longer existed as guardians and protectors of national currencies, but rather as tools for creating politicized market distortions, abandoning their duty to preserve wealth in favor of creating the conditions for limitless, cheap government debt. While many of the underlying intentions were benign, the process inherently worked to punish savers and reward reckless debt.

Meanwhile, it has steadily taken time for the potential of digital assets to reach their potential and approach something like critical mass, though thankfully full acceptance shouldn’t take as long as Britain’s industrial revolution. Over the past 12 years, cryptocurrencies have moved from unknown to novel to significant, growing interest. As a result, profound changes are underway, affecting the mechanics by which investors, the investment industry, wealth managers and even the commercial banking sector are engaging with cryptocurrencies.

This interest has accelerated as we enter into a period of deep economic uncertainty and growing awareness that structural soundness is shifting away from traditional investment options. Not only that, this growing financial innovation and public interest has largely occurred outside of the central banks’ control, if not outright antagonism led by the banks’ regulatory arms in government.

Now, many central banks are trying to join a game they’ve tried almost every way of beating, with digital currencies that adopt the glowing sheen of crypto innovation, but which also eschew the underlying innovations and philosophy that made those innovations so popular to begin with.

Follow or get out of the way

The popularity of cryptocurrency has largely been due to its protean fungibility — it has been whatever the independent financial community has needed it to be, from digital currency to speculative financial instruments to smart contracts that can power smart financial technology.

However hard central banks might try to co-opt the hype of cryptocurrency, cryptocurrency succeeding will mark the fundamental end of critical aspects of the central banking monopoly by offering a more competitive vehicle for facilitating commercial transactions and providing a more stable medium to store monetized assets. Cryptocurrencies actually offer real returns on “cash” deposits, something that the fiat banking system has long since abandoned. Most of all, cryptocurrencies reveal the fictitious nature of fiat currencies as a principle.

Cryptocurrencies as an ecosystem will increasingly constrain, redirect and set the parameters for government macroeconomic policies. Certainly, sound alternatives to fiat currencies will drive the latter to the periphery of commercial life, concomitantly reducing the number of tools the nation-state has at its disposal to regulate or respond to changing economic conditions. Above all, this means that government financial engagement can no longer be a rule unto itself. It will have to engage by the same principles as everyone else. A level playing field here has dramatic implications.

Against the backdrop of the essential limits of fiat currencies, current geo- and macroeconomic policies and a new emerging world order, cryptocurrencies offer vast potential as an efficiency facilitating frictionless commerce and investment, a medium of stability against uncertainty and inflation, increased security in value transfer and wealth management, optimum autonomy in an increasingly intrusive climate, and “cash” asset preservation/growth in a world of negative interest rates.

The edifice that supports the concept of a “global reserve currency” is also weakening. This will reduce political influence over global finance, as well as nations’ abilities to run a long-term balance of payments deficits, current account deficits and borrow at little or no interest. Indeed, given current trends, changes in trading mechanics may speedily evolve to the point that such “reserve currencies” no longer have a function at all. And cryptocurrency success will hasten the end of the U.S. dollar monopoly in global commerce.

The views, thoughts and opinions expressed here are the author’s alone and do not necessarily reflect or represent the views and opinions of Cointelegraph.

James Gillingham is the CEO and a co-founder of Finxflo. James is engaged in developing and implementing strategic plans and company policies, maintaining an open dialogue with stakeholders and driving organizational success. He is an expert in managing and executing high-level strategic objectives with more than 13 years’ experience in building, developing and expanding multinational organizations. His deep knowledge of financial markets, digital currencies and fintech has played a pivotal role in his success to date.