3 key on-chain metrics suggest Ethereum price is in a 2017-style bull run
Published
1 Monat ago
on
By
Ether (ETH) price is currently ranging between $440 and $470, which is similar to the price action seen in December 2017. Back then, the scenario ended up being incredibly bullish, and the altcoin quickly rocketed toward $1,400.
Fast forward to 2020, and some investors believe a similar outcome may occur as a few key on-chain and technical indicators are mirroring the levels seen in the previous bull run.
On Dec. 10 Ether price was $450, and it took only 34 days for Ether to reach its all-time high. Before this price explosion, the altcoin traded sideways for over two weeks. If something similar were to happen, on-chain metrics and historical data suggest it could happen over the next ten days.
Ether in Dec 2017 (left) vs Nov 2020 (right). Source: TradingView
Take notice of how the recent price movements raised investors’ hope that the next crypto-bull market will mirror the one seen in late-2017. Although the price is an important metric, it does not provide granularity for network usage and volume.
To assess the size and amount of daily transactions, Coinmetrics provides adjusted transactions and transfers data.
Ether daily average transactions (left) vs ETH price. Source: Digital Assets Data
The above chart shows $1.9 billion of the most recent transfers and transactions, a 46% increase from the previous month. Although Ether’s price increase undoubtedly helped, the same effect happened in late-2017.
Daily average transactions and transfers notional. Source: CoinMetrics
The daily average notional transacted and transferred on the Ethereum network in November 2017 stood at $830 million. This all changed by the end of the month, as the indicator broke the $2 billion mark. This same indicator has strong ties to the current scenario.
To better gauge network activity, one should also analyze the daily number of active addresses. Although it should not be interpreted as the number of active users, it provides a reliable network usage gauge.
Ether daily active addresses (right) and Ether price (left). Source: Digital Assets Data
November data seems to be repeating the previous month’s peak at 550,000 daily active addresses. This time around, activity appears to be at a much higher level than the late-2017 era.
Of course, one might need to adjust to the growing use of decentralized finance (DeFi) and stablecoins. Yield pools and decentralized exchanges are responsible for tens of thousands of daily transactions involving multiple addresses.
Ether daily active addresses. Source: CoinMetrics
As one should expect, the number of daily active addresses back in November 2017 stood at 200,000, significatively below the current number. Nevertheless, they managed to catch up to 500,000 network addresses per day by the end of the year.
On-chain analytics might have been close enough to the current state, but price action relies heavily on volume. After all, trading activity doesn’t necessarily hold a direct relation to the network use.
Ether average daily volume. Source: Messari
The current $1.3 billion in daily average volume represents a 50% increase from the previous month. This data is a remarkable fact as it does not include decentralized exchanges.
Ether daily transparent volume. Source: Messari
Oddly enough, the current Ether volume stands out at the same level seen in Dec. 2017. Therefore one might conclude that this is too much of a coincidence to be disregarded.
The current daily active addresses, transactions/transfers notional, and traded volume are aligned with the 2017 year-end period when Ether traded near the $450 mark.
For this reason, analysts have solid reasons to believe that a $1,400 bull run is within the realm of possibility within the next few weeks.
Will a renewed decentralized finance (DeFi) frenzy be enough to generate an inflow similar to the one seen during the 2017 ICO era? Or will it be institutional and larger-sized investors who sustain a powerful 300% rally?
Remember, as the saying goes, ‘history doesn’t repeat, but it often rhymes.’
The views and opinions expressed here are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Cointelegraph. Every investment and trading move involves risk. You should conduct your own research when making a decision.
Bitcoin price rally cools down as Polkadot gains 34% in first week of ‘altseason’
Published
11 Stunden ago
on
Dezember 29, 2020
By
Bitcoin (BTC) fell below $26,000 on Dec. 29 as fresh fallout from Ripple’s threatened U.S. lawsuit was felt throughout crypto markets.
Cryptocurrency market overview. Source: Coin360
BTC price dips as Coinbase halts XRP trading
Data from Cointelegraph Markets, Coin360 and TradingView showed BTC/USD hitting lows of $25,830 during Tuesday trading.
$27,000 support failed to hold overnight, sparking a retest of lower levels which now center on $26,000. At the weekend, Bitcoin hit all-time highs of $28,400 before swiftly reversing.
The latest losses come as XRP, the fourth-largest cryptocurrency by market cap, hits $0.23 thanks to major U.S. exchange Coinbase opting to suspend trading from next month. The reason is a lawsuit from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), which threatens to classify XRP as an unlicensed security and make trading it all but impossible.
“There is going to be a rangebound construction, after which 2021 will most likely break out again,” Cointelegraph Markets analyst Michaël van de Poppe summarized about Bitcoin’s short-term perspectives in a video update on Monday.
Analyst braced for altseason
Van de Poppe is eyeing altcoins as next in line to see major gains. XRP notwithstanding, the market is already showing signs of life, with Ether (ETH) climbing above $700 for the first time since May 2018 this week.
Another winner on Tuesday was Polkadot (DOT), now the seventh-largest token by market cap, which saw a 22.5% daily rise, capping weekly performance of nearly 34%.
For Van de Poppe, the next “impulse wave” on Bitcoin in 2021 should take the market to $40,000 or $50,000, but “until then, altcoins will most likely do well.”
He additionally pointed to a likely top in Bitcoin market cap dominance, which at almost 70% should soon give way to altcoin presence. December tends to see BTC dominance peaks, with 2017, the time of Bitcoin’s first attempt to crack $20,000, a notable comparison.
Dynamic Set Dollar faces “massive test” as stablecoin falls as low as $.27
Published
2 Tagen ago
on
Dezember 28, 2020
By
While wild price action on Bitcoin and Ethereum have claimed the attention of most traders over the Christmas weekend, a select sect of crypto traders are following an experiment playing out in real-time that may have implications for the future of stablecoins: the fate of Dynamic Set Dollar.
Dynamic Set Dollar and its DSD token is an algorithmic stablecoin project designed to — eventually — track the United States Dollar on a 1-1 ratio with DSD. During expansionary cycles, such as one that led DSD as high as $3 per token last week, users are rewarded with freshly-printed “rebased” tokens for providing liquidity.
According to Avalanche blockchain platform founder Emin Gün Sirer, however, developers of protocols like DSD face a much tricker task during price dumps like the one DSD is currently experiencing: incentivizing users to adjust the amount of tokens in circulation. In DSD’s case, holders can burn their tokens at any time for “coupons” which they can redeem at any point within 30 days so long as DSD is above $1 per token — hypothetically enabling them to reap significant profit.
“These mechanisms rely on whales who will jump in and out of the coin in order to stabilize its price around the intended target,” said Sirer in an interview with Cointelegraph. “And they implicitly assume that the whales share the exact same worldview as the coin’s designers: that the stablecoin should be worth $1. But if the whales do not share this view themselves, […] the coins can fail and break their intended peg.”
In a Twitter thread on Saturday, Sirer noted that this disconnect between game theoretics and developer intentions can lead participants in a protocol to identifying a Schelling point/price peg, but not the one developers had in mind:
To use technical jargon, there may indeed be a Schelling point, but that point may reside somewhere other than the designer’s intended $1. Let me illustrate.
These dicey dynamics have led other observers, such as Ari Paul, the chief investment officer at BlockTower Capital, to conclude that the project is indistinguishable from a “pump and dump.” Decentralized finance (DeFi) maven Tyler Reynolds, however, believes that if DSD pulls through, it could mean that it’s established itself as “the next big decentralized stablecoin.”
These just look like pump and dumps to me♂️. Not necessarily by design, or the fault of the team, but how many Ample’s do we need? Those in early and out early make a ton of money. By the time people buy off of influencer tweets, they’re probably losing 60%+ within a month.
For Sirer, these kinds of uncertainties are to be expected — and traders need to take them into account.
“Because the science behind these experiments is not yet well-established, there is considerable risk and traders need to carry out their own research,” he said. “Personally, I look for three critical components: uses for the stable coin beyond just speculation; an incentive mechanism that offers realistic, modest yields during periods of stability; and a dedicated, well-capitalized, and competent team behind the coin.”
So far, the market seems to think Dynamic Set Dollar clears the bar. After hitting a low of $.27 earlier today, DSD has been climbing steadily and sits at $.63 at press time. Moreover, intrepid block explorers have noticed significant on-chain volumes indicating that whales are indeed buying and burning DSD for coupons:
789k $DSD spent on coupons what a chadhttps://t.co/aVJan57lgt
Still, Sirer warms that even if DSD recovers, it could be subject to future gut-punch dumps.
“Algorithmic stablecoins all incorporate feedback loops designed to dampen oscillations around the targeted peg value,” he said. “They seem to do best when they are trading close to the target peg, and not so well when they diverge. A coin that veers into dangerous territory and then recovers might very well be subject to similar oscillations in the future.”
Aside from price action and traders’ fortunes, however, Sirer says these experiments are also key to pushing DeFi forward. Sirer points to MakerDAO, Balancer, DyDx and Uniswap as previous algorithmic experiments that have become “genuinely useful instruments that provide critical functionality.”
And in the end, as the science gets better, projects like DSD will eventually achieve long-term viability, he concluded.