Blockchain
Top crypto adoption predictions that came true in 2020
Published
2 Wochen agoon
By
Throughout the past decade, a lot has been said about Bitcoin (BTC) and the future of cryptocurrencies. However, 2020 has so far been a defining year for the industry as current events bring to life what was predicted in the past.
The world of cryptocurrency has historically been exclusive to Twitter battles and private chats on Telegram. Even when Bitcoin received its brief moment of fame on mainstream media, mentions of the token were mostly in dismissal of its potential, with some prominent individuals calling the entire industry a scam soon to burst.
However, the tide of the turbulent relationship between traditional financial institutions and cryptocurrencies is changing. In 2020, former critics of cryptocurrencies such as JP Morgan have extended their banking services to Bitcoin exchanges as the predominant cryptocurrency’s impressive performance becomes undeniable.
Granted, the opinions of influential leaders in the world of finance hold certain sway over market trends. In 2020, however, it appears that the crypto world has defied most of its critics. Below are the top quotes from 2020 that defined the year’s trend. Some are prophetic, while others highlight the current state of Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies or opine on what will come next.
Crypto is better than cash?
All the way back in 2013 and 2014, Bill Gates, a philanthropist and the co-founder of Microsoft, was quoted saying that “Bitcoin is better than currency in that you don’t have to be physically in the same place and, of course, for large transactions, currency can get pretty inconvenient.”
In 2020, the relevance of Gate’s statement is increasingly magnified as Bitcoin continues to play a larger role in the world’s cashless future. Granted, cold, hard cash is still king, but a glance at global financial trends reveals a change in the tides. According to reports, cash transactions in most countries are disappearing, with cash payments accounting for 20% of all Sweden’s payments and 14% for South Korea’s. Additionally, health concerns about COVID-19 are expected to push the world closer to a cashless society.
However, it’s also evident that the end of cash might come at a cost. While cash is bulky and inconvenient in some ways, it offers the easiest way to transact anonymously. Digital cashless payment alternatives, on the other hand, require a middle man and do not maintain privacy. With more governments pushing for a move toward central bank digital currencies, Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies are emerging as the best private centric- and censorship-resistant alternative.
Bill Gates’ statements about Bitcoin being better than cash is also seen in Bitcoin’s capped supply. Due to the coronavirus pandemic, which has impacted most of the world in 2020, governments across the globe moved to print more money to curb the economic crisis. Meanwhile, Bitcoin experienced a deflationary event in May. The halving of its mining rewards reduced the coin’s incoming supply by half. With this in mind, Robert Kiyosaki, a prominent investor and author of Rich Dad Poor Dad predicted that Bitcoin’s price will hit a high of $75,000 in the next three years.
All in all, events throughout the year have proven that Bitcoin, altcoins and blockchain technology are, at the very least, viable alternatives to cash, as they can enable faster payment times at higher transaction volumes and lowest costs. As Nasim Taleb, a statistician and former risk analyst, put it many moons ago: “Bitcoin is the beginning of something great: a currency without a government, something necessary and imperative.”
Ethereum outperforming Bitcoin
Despite Bitcoin’s price volatility in 2020, significant gains have been made, considering its current price is hovering around $18,000. However, Bitcoin’s success seems meager compared to the milestones Ethereum has achieved in 2020.
Excitement about Bitcoin’s halving event caught the attention of many in the crypto space for the better part of the year. It was a defining moment in 2020, as the price of Bitcoin is historically known to spike after a halving event. However, that talk was soon cut short by a new wave of excitement around the booming decentralized finance sector.
“DeFi” became the crypto space’s new favorite buzzword as developers created financial instruments and institutions that run autonomously on computers and freely accessible to anyone with a smartphone.
DeFi startups such as Compound allow anyone to start earning an estimated interest of about 7% a year in less than 30 minutes. Users on such DeFi platforms can lend and loan money using stablecoins without going through the cumbersome Know Your Customer verification procedures common among traditional financial institutions.
The runaway success of DeFi projects saw the amount of value locked in DeFi applications surpass $1 billion for the first time in 2020. Today, the total value locked in DeFi projects is over $14 billion.
Even the Coinbase crypto exchange injected $2 million worth of liquidity into a couple of DeFi projects, remarking that DeFi is “an essential part of an open financial system. DeFi tools are censorship-resistant, unbiased, programmable, and available to anyone with a smartphone.”
Despite drawbacks experienced by Ethereum’s network in the form of soaring fees resulting from increased demand for block space by DeFi apps, the network still managed to achieve major breakthroughs. In particular, Ethereum has begun Phase 0 of its transition from proof-of-work to a scalable proof-of-stake protocol.
Various market experts agree that Ethereum will mount a challenge over the dominance across the crypto and blockchain sector. The reality of Ethereum as an emerging force to reckon with was best captured by Richard Branson, an entrepreneur and owner of the Virgin empire, who said in 2014 that despite Bitcoin’s dominance, “there may be other currencies like it that may be even better.”
Blockchain-based businesses
In a quote, Eric Schmidt, former Google CEO, once said, “The ability to create something which is not duplicable in the digital world has enormous value,” and that “lots of people will build businesses on top of that.” So far, the reality of this quote has materialized in 2020, with reports of an upsurge in the adoption of blockchain- and DLT-based business solutions.
As the COVID-19 pandemic pushed more institutions and organizations to look for digital workflow alternatives, digitalization across the globe has been particularly accelerated in international trade and other sectors hindered by intensive and inefficient paper workflows.
A report released by Trade Finance Global and World Trade Organization shows an increase in the number of DLT and blockchain-based projects with real-world use cases. According to the report, the push toward DLT and blockchain-based solutions was started in order to achieve increased workflow efficiency, reduce transaction costs and improve collaboration.
The unfortunate events of 2020 have brought out blockchain’s potential as a technology that facilitates collaboration in a digital world, automating trust and enabling digital scarcity for the creation of digital assets.
Crypto value lost to scammers
Another of Richard Branson’s quotes rings true in 2020: “People have made fortunes off Bitcoin, some have lost money.” This year will go down in history as the year of a revival for scammers and thieves in the crypto space. In the first 10 months of 2020 alone, crypto scammers stole over $1.8 billion. A blockchain forensics company reported that the value lost in 2020 as a result of crypto crimes surged by 160%.
In most cases, scammers took advantage of the booming DeFi sector, contributing about 21% of the total crypto value lost in 2020.
Combined with the lack of sufficient crypto education among the masses, increasingly sophisticated and aggressive schemes by scammers and thieves have made easy pickings of even more people. In addition, the frenzied profit-chasing that took place during the DeFi boom has provided crypto con-artists with a much larger capacity to cart away huge sums of value.
In July, the Twitter accounts of prominent public figures like Elon Musk, Bill Gates and Jeff Bezos were hacked to promote a Bitcoin giveaway scam. Other scammers used YouTube live streams with videos of unconsenting individuals such as Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak to scam people out of their Bitcoin. A whale alert report estimates that the scam market has increased by 2,000% since 2017.
Cryptocurrency outperforming gold
Mike Novogratz, CEO and founder of Galaxy digital holdings, said back in 2018 that he believes Bitcoin is digital gold, adding: “That means it’s the only one of the coins out there that gets to be a legal pyramid scheme. Just like gold is.”
Bitcoin has gone as far as outperforming gold in 2020. Returns from global stocks, bonds and gold commodities are up by 20%, while the Bloomberg Galaxy Crypto Index of digital coins has rallied by 65%.
Although one of the main reasons for this surge is attributed to the DeFi boom, market analysts believe crypto markets have also performed well thanks to the strengthening of the narrative that Bitcoin can act as a hedge in times of economic uncertainty.
While skeptics opine that the current surge is nothing more than a wild swing on a tide of DeFi liquidity, Tyler and Cameron Winklevoss, co-founders of the Gemini crypto exchange, have doubled down on their belief that Bitcoin is superior to gold. “Our basic thesis for Bitcoin is that it is better than gold,” said Tyler while speaking to the Financial Times back in 2016.
Even though Bitcoin gets its value from mimicking gold’s natural scarcity, durability and portability, the twin brothers believe that the emergence of asteroid mining technology could potentially reduce the scarcity of gold and dilute its value in the long run. In such a case, the capped supply of Bitcoin will lead to an increase in its value above gold. “Bitcoins are like gold bars with wings, That is why I and so many others, view Bitcoin and its network as gold 2.0,” added Tyler Winklevoss.
A win for decentralization?
As it seems, 2020 will go down as the year that saw Bitcoin and the cryptocurrency industry emerge from operating in strange and obscure lanes to a fully fledged mainstream financial instrument. The willingness of Paypal and Microstrategy in becoming affiliated with crypto is a testament to this.
According to a Harvard Business Review article, the global healthcare upheaval of 2020 has “revealed the weaknesses in our inability to deploy resources where they are mostly needed,” and that “blockchain solutions have been unleashed to address these challenges.”
Even before the pandemic, the world was moving toward a decentralized economic structure with a decline in the stigma attached to remote working. Even though there are inherent limitations in the current state of blockchain technology, development in the DeFi space and around projects like Ethereum are increasingly preparing the sector for a new financial future.
Bitcoin creator Satoshi Nakamoto once highlighted the superiority of decentralization over centralization, and how central banking is part of the problem: “The root problem with conventional currency is all the trust that’s required to make it work.” Well said, Satoshi.
You may like
-
Bets on Tech Stocks and Cryptocurrencies Brought Small Fortune to US Top Funds in 2020
-
Crypto taxes, reporting and tax audits in 2021
-
Bullish and Bearish Bitcoin Price Predictions for 2021
-
Bets on Tech Stocks and Cryptocurrencies Brought Small Fortune to US Top Funds in 2020
-
BlackRock Seeks VP Blockchain Lead to ‘Drive Demand’ for Firm’s Crypto Offerings
-
Crypto Long & Short: The Christmas Poem Edition
Blockchain
Bringing carbon emissions reporting into the new age via blockchain
Published
46 Minuten agoon
Dezember 29, 2020By
Blockchain for supply chain management is one of the most practical business applications for large, multi-party sectors seeking trust and transparency across daily operations. As such, the mining and metals sector has now started to leverage blockchain technology to effectively track carbon emissions across complex, global supply chains.
This month, the World Economic Forum launched a proof-of-concept to trace carbon emissions across the supply chains of seven mining and metals firms. Known as the Mining and Metals Blockchain Initiative, or MMBI, this is a collaboration between the WEF and industry companies including Anglo American, Antofagasta Minerals, Eurasian Resources Group, Glencore, Klöckner & Co., Minsur, and Tata Steel.
Jörgen Sandström, head of the WEF’s Mining and Metals Industry, told Cointelegraph that the distributed nature of blockchain technology makes it the perfect solution for companies within the sector looking to trace carbon emissions:
“Forward-thinking organizations in the mining and metals space are starting to understand the disruptive potential of blockchain to solve pain points, while also recognizing that the industry-wide collaboration around blockchain is necessary.”
According to Sandström, many blockchain projects intended to support responsible sourcing have been bilateral, resulting in a fractured system. However, this new initiative from the WEF is driven entirely by the mining and metals industry and aims to demonstrate blockchain’s full potential to track carbon emissions across the entire value chain.
While vast, the current proof-of-concept is focused on tracing carbon emissions in the copper value chain, Sandström shared. He also explained that a private blockchain network powered by Dutch blockchain development company Kryha is being leveraged to track greenhouse gas emissions from the mine to the smelter and all the way to the original equipment manufacturer. Sandström mentioned that the platform’s vision is to create a carbon emissions blueprint for all essential metals, demonstrating mine-to-market-and-back via recycling.
To put things in perspective, according to a recent report from McKinsey & Company, mining is currently responsible for 4% to 7% of greenhouse gas emissions globally. The document states that Scope 1 and Scope 2 CO2 emissions from the sector (those incurred through mining operations and power consumption) amount to 1%, while fugitive-methane emissions from coal mining are estimated at 3% to 6%. Additionally, 28% of global emissions is considered Scope 3, or indirect emissions, including the combustion of coal.
Unfortunately, the mining industry has been slow to meet emission-reduction goals. The document notes that current targets published by mining companies range from 0% to 30% by 2030 — well below the goals laid out in the Paris Agreement. Moreover, the COVID-19 crisis has exacerbated the sector’s unwillingness to change. A blog post from Big Four firm Ernest & Young shows that decarbonization and a green agenda will be one of the biggest business opportunities for mining and metals companies in 2021, as these have become prominent issues in the wake of the pandemic. Sandström added:
“The industry needs to respond to the increasing demands of minerals and materials while responding to increasing demands by consumers, shareholders and regulators for a higher degree of sustainability and traceability of the products.”
Why blockchain?
While it’s clear that the mining and metals industry needs to reduce carbon emissions to meet sustainability standards and other goals, blockchain is arguably a solution that can deliver just that in comparison to other technologies.
This concept was outlined in detail in an NS Energy op-ed written by Joan Collell, a business strategy leader and the chief commercial officer at FlexiDAO, an energy technology software provider. He explained that Scope 1, 2 and 3 emission supply chains must all be measured accurately, requiring a high level of integration and coordination between multiple supply chain networks. He added:
“Different entities have to share the necessary data for the sustainability certification of products and to guarantee their traceability. This is an essential step, since everything that can be quantified is no longer a risk, but it becomes a management problem.”
According to Collel, data sharing has two main purposes: to provide transparency and traceability. Meanwhile, the main feature of a blockchain network is to provide transparency and traceability across multiple participants. On this, Collel noted: “The distributed ledger of blockchain can register in real time the consumption data of different entities across different locations and calculate the carbon intensity of that consumption.”
Collel also noted that a digital certificate outlining the amount of energy transferred can then be produced, showing exactly where and when emissions were produced. Ultimately, blockchain can provide trust, traceability and auditability across mining and metals supply chains, thus helping reduce carbon emissions.
Data challenges may hamper productivity
While blockchain may appear as the ideal solution for tracing carbon emissions across mining and metals supply chains, data challenges must be taken into consideration.
Sal Ternullo, co-lead for U.S. Cryptoasset Services at KPMG, told Cointelegraph that capturing data cryptographically across the entire value chain will indeed transform the ability to accurately measure the carbon intensity of different metals. “It’s all about the accuracy of source, the resulting data and the intrinsic value that can be verified end to end,” he said. However, Ternullo pointed out that data capture and validation are the hardest parts of this equation:
“Where, when, how (source-cadence-process) are issues that organizations are still grappling with. There are a number of blockchain protocols and solutions that can be configured to meet this use case but the challenge of data capture and validation is often not considered to the extent that it should be.”
According to Ternullo, the sector’s lack of clear standards on how emissions should be tracked further compounds these challenges. He mentioned that while some organizations have doubled down on the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board’s capture and reporting standard, there are several other standards that must be evaluated before an organization can proceed with automation, technology and analytical components that would make these processes transparent to both shareholders and consumers.
To his point, Sandström mentioned that the current proof-of-concept focused on tracing carbon emissions in the copper value chain demonstrates that participants can collaborate and test practical solutions to sustainability issues that cannot be resolved by individual companies. At the same time, Sandström stated that the WEF is sensitive to how data is treated and shared: “Having an industry approach enables us to focus on practical and finding viable ways to deliver on our vision.”
An industry approach is also helpful, with Ternullo explaining that an organization’s operating models for culture and technology must be aligned to ensure success. This is the case with all enterprise blockchain projects that require data sharing and new ways of collaboration, which may very well be easier to overcome when performed from an industry perspective.
Blockchain
The new ‘Bank of England’ is ‘no bank at all’
Published
1 Stunde agoon
Dezember 29, 2020By
As one of the first countries to industrialize in the 1760s, Britain’s manufacturing revolution instigated one of the greatest practical and ubiquitous changes in human history. But even more extraordinary than the cultural shift itself, is the fact that Britain’s industrialization remained way ahead of potential competition for decades. Only in the early 1900s did historians come to grips with the issues of causation. Max Weber’s pithy answer, “the Protestant work ethic,” pointed to Puritan seriousness, diligence, fiscal prudence and hard work. Others point to the establishment of the Bank of England in 1694 as a foundation for financial stability.
In contrast, continental Europe lurched from one national debt crisis to another, then threw itself headlong into the Napoleonic wars. Unsurprisingly, it was not until after 1815 that industrialization took place on the European mainland, where it was spearheaded by the new country of Belgium.
250 years later, another revolution has begun with the launch of Bitcoin (BTC), but this one is more commercial in nature than industrial. Though the full impact has yet to play out, the parallels between these two historical events are already striking.
Bitcoin may not match the obviousness of industrialization, but the underlying pragmatics touch on the very foundations of the non-barter economy. Like the establishment of the Bank of England, the creation of the cryptocurrency infrastructure has been prompted by ongoing and worsening threats to financial stability: systemic fault-lines created by macroeconomic challenges stemming from the 2008 financial crisis.
If you can’t beat ‘em, join ‘em…right?
Where a central bank once anchored financial enlightenment, it now plays the role of antagonist. For those who could “connect the dots” in 2008, there was the realization that central banks no longer existed as guardians and protectors of national currencies, but rather as tools for creating politicized market distortions, abandoning their duty to preserve wealth in favor of creating the conditions for limitless, cheap government debt. While many of the underlying intentions were benign, the process inherently worked to punish savers and reward reckless debt.
Meanwhile, it has steadily taken time for the potential of digital assets to reach their potential and approach something like critical mass, though thankfully full acceptance shouldn’t take as long as Britain’s industrial revolution. Over the past 12 years, cryptocurrencies have moved from unknown to novel to significant, growing interest. As a result, profound changes are underway, affecting the mechanics by which investors, the investment industry, wealth managers and even the commercial banking sector are engaging with cryptocurrencies.
This interest has accelerated as we enter into a period of deep economic uncertainty and growing awareness that structural soundness is shifting away from traditional investment options. Not only that, this growing financial innovation and public interest has largely occurred outside of the central banks’ control, if not outright antagonism led by the banks’ regulatory arms in government.
Now, many central banks are trying to join a game they’ve tried almost every way of beating, with digital currencies that adopt the glowing sheen of crypto innovation, but which also eschew the underlying innovations and philosophy that made those innovations so popular to begin with.
Follow or get out of the way
The popularity of cryptocurrency has largely been due to its protean fungibility — it has been whatever the independent financial community has needed it to be, from digital currency to speculative financial instruments to smart contracts that can power smart financial technology.
However hard central banks might try to co-opt the hype of cryptocurrency, cryptocurrency succeeding will mark the fundamental end of critical aspects of the central banking monopoly by offering a more competitive vehicle for facilitating commercial transactions and providing a more stable medium to store monetized assets. Cryptocurrencies actually offer real returns on “cash” deposits, something that the fiat banking system has long since abandoned. Most of all, cryptocurrencies reveal the fictitious nature of fiat currencies as a principle.
Cryptocurrencies as an ecosystem will increasingly constrain, redirect and set the parameters for government macroeconomic policies. Certainly, sound alternatives to fiat currencies will drive the latter to the periphery of commercial life, concomitantly reducing the number of tools the nation-state has at its disposal to regulate or respond to changing economic conditions. Above all, this means that government financial engagement can no longer be a rule unto itself. It will have to engage by the same principles as everyone else. A level playing field here has dramatic implications.
Against the backdrop of the essential limits of fiat currencies, current geo- and macroeconomic policies and a new emerging world order, cryptocurrencies offer vast potential as an efficiency facilitating frictionless commerce and investment, a medium of stability against uncertainty and inflation, increased security in value transfer and wealth management, optimum autonomy in an increasingly intrusive climate, and “cash” asset preservation/growth in a world of negative interest rates.
The edifice that supports the concept of a “global reserve currency” is also weakening. This will reduce political influence over global finance, as well as nations’ abilities to run a long-term balance of payments deficits, current account deficits and borrow at little or no interest. Indeed, given current trends, changes in trading mechanics may speedily evolve to the point that such “reserve currencies” no longer have a function at all. And cryptocurrency success will hasten the end of the U.S. dollar monopoly in global commerce.
The views, thoughts and opinions expressed here are the author’s alone and do not necessarily reflect or represent the views and opinions of Cointelegraph.
James Gillingham is the CEO and a co-founder of Finxflo. James is engaged in developing and implementing strategic plans and company policies, maintaining an open dialogue with stakeholders and driving organizational success. He is an expert in managing and executing high-level strategic objectives with more than 13 years’ experience in building, developing and expanding multinational organizations. His deep knowledge of financial markets, digital currencies and fintech has played a pivotal role in his success to date.
Blockchain
Why you wouldn’t eat chicken nuggets, and why you shouldn’t trust Big Data
Published
11 Stunden agoon
Dezember 29, 2020By
Just like you might think twice about eating chicken nuggets once you see how they are made, you’d likely hesitate about volunteering your personal information once you see how it is used and monetized.
Freedom has become one of the world’s most commoditized assets — and over the years, the internet has eroded it.
We live in a world where we’re confronted with 5,000 words of terms and conditions when buying sneakers. Crucial details about what companies do with our data is buried in masses of legalese — prompting most of us to click “I agree” without thinking of the consequences.
In other cases, companies are unacceptably opaque about how our data is used. This is a big problem when businesses are offering their services for “free”… provided we can give our email address, phone number and a few other details.
A scene from the recent sci-fi series Maniac perfectly illustrated where the world is heading. A character is given a choice — they can either pay for their subway ticket or get it for free in exchange for some personal information. As you’d guess, they bluntly chose the latter.
That’s basically what we’re doing every day — giving our data to corporations, big and small, and sacrificing our privacy and freedom in the process.
It’s gotten so bad that individual states have had to step in with rules and regulations designed to protect the public, many of whom are unaware of what they’re signing up for when they tick a seemingly innocuous box on a website.
And it’s also telling that tech giants are worried about the taps being turned off. When Apple unveiled a new feature that would enable users to opt out of having their activity tracked across apps and websites, Facebook launched a ferocious PR campaign against the measures. The social network said it was speaking out to protect the small businesses who rely on its platform for targeted advertising. Cynics among you will see it as a brazen attempt to protect profits by a company charged with some of the most insidious and influential data mining in history.
Pandora’s box has been opened
The tide is beginning to change — because we’ve opened Pandora’s box — and the world is starting to have long-overdue discussions about the privacy we’re entitled to online.
For more than 10 years now, we’ve experienced abundant financial freedom thanks to Bitcoin (BTC) and its rivals… but there’s still a long way to go in other parts of our society.
Last week, I went to the shop and spontaneously bought some moisturizer, and when I got home, I did a Google search to learn more about the product. For the next seven days, I was bombarded with moisturizer ads on Facebook.
Just like our health, our well-being and our careers, freedom is an inner personal responsibility that we need to monitor, maintain and protect — especially in the digital realm, where it can all too easily be sold in exchange for access to free services.
To feel free and safe in our homes, we rely on the privacy of our ownership, and the trustworthiness of our friends and neighbors. Government laws and housing association rules underwrite this. But we also entrust our financial privacy to institutions — in the expectation that they will be held accountable by regulators and central banks — and the whole reason Bitcoin launched in 2009 was because our expectations weren’t being met.
Why blockchain is the answer
Every modern proof-of-stake blockchain tackles the problems surrounding digital privacy and trust in a unique way, and in these vibrant communities, decentralized governance helps to ensure that standards are upheld, with slashing mechanisms serving as a deterrent to those who are tempted to work against a network’s best interests.
With PoS blockchains, users benefit from informed consent. They’re kept in the loop about proposals for improving and expanding the network and ideas for new services. Digital social consensus means they can read debates about the pros and cons associated with each proposal, come to their own conclusions, and cast a vote accordingly. Can you honestly imagine a tech giant doing this?
Privacy issues can be solved by generating abstract network addresses that are not permanently tied to public keys — or through the use of special proxy smart contracts, which are similar to VPN and Tor but on top of the blockchain.
Can blockchain technology solve some of the most pressing privacy and trust issues seen in a generation? I believe so. Once the technology is there and transactions are cheap enough, consumers will be able to make a choice — share their private data or pay a small fee instead.
We need to learn harsh lessons from the past and make the right decision this time around. I remember the early days of email when spam messages were a big issue. A small sender’s fee was considered as a way of circumventing this problem — but in the end, the likes of Gmail came out on top. Now, there’s no monetary cost… we just pay the small price of Google hosting all of our electronic correspondence.
Proof-of-stake blockchains can deliver cheap transactions, decentralized governance that regulates the network’s rules, maximum privacy, and no data collection policies. Each story starts with trust — and in the blockchain world, the trust starts with the network.
The views, thoughts and opinions expressed here are the author’s alone and do not necessarily reflect or represent the views and opinions of Cointelegraph.
Vladimir Maslyakov is the CTO of Thekey.space and former CTO of Exante.eu. He developed several distributed financial systems as an IT architect. He has been a blockchain enthusiast since 2012 and is an initial member of the Free TON community.
Hackers Exploit DeFi Project Cover Protocol, COVER Token Price Tanks 90%
Dormant Bitcoin on the move as price volatility rises
eToro Said to Be in Talks With Goldman About Possible $5B IPO: Report
Trending
-
Bitcoin4 Monaten agoBitcoin and cryptocurrency are no hedge for inflation
-
Regulation3 Monaten agoCongress weighs crypto payments and fintech lending in hearing today
-
Bitcoin3 Monaten agoMicroStrategy CEO seems to embrace Bitcoin maximalism
-
Altcoin3 Monaten agoDfinance: Layer 2 Blockchain Network
-
Cryptocurrency4 Monaten agoBank of England is Planing to Adopt Digital Currency
-
Monero9 Monaten agoSophisticated Mining Botnet Identified After 2 Years
-
Market4 Monaten ago
The request could not be satisfied
-
Blockchain3 Monaten agoThe US is number one…in blockchain patents

